Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndrás Kedves
dc.contributor.authorZoltán Tóth
dc.contributor.authorMiklós Emri
dc.contributor.authorKrisztián Fábián
dc.contributor.authorDávid Sipos
dc.contributor.authorOmar Freihat
dc.contributor.authorJózsef Tollár
dc.contributor.authorZsolt Cselik
dc.contributor.authorFerenc Lakosi
dc.contributor.authorGábor Bajzik
dc.contributor.authorImre Repa
dc.contributor.authorÁrpád Kovács
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-11T13:16:16Z
dc.date.available2024-04-11T13:16:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://pea.lib.pte.hu/handle/pea/44974
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of the pretreatment,metabolic,and diffusion parameters of a primary tumor assessed with PET/MR on patientclinical outcomes.Methods: Retrospective evaluation was performed using PET/MR image data setsacquired using the single tracer injection dual imaging of 68 histologically proven headand neck cancer patients 4 weeks before receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).PET/MR was performed before the CRT and 12 weeks after the CRT for responseevaluation. Image data (PET and MRI diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) was used tospecify the maximum standard uptake value, the peak lean body mass corrected,SUVmax, the metabolic tumor volume, the total lesion glycolysis (SUVmax, SULpeak, MTV,and TLG), and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) of the primary tumor.Based on the results of the therapeutic response evaluation, two patient subgroups werecreated: one with a viable tumor and another without. Metabolic and diffusion data,from the pretreatment PET/MR and the therapeutic response, were correlated usingSpearman’s correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon’s test.Results: After completing the CRT, a viable residual tumor was detectedin 36/68 (53%) cases, and 32/68 (47%) patients showed complete remission.However, no significant correlation was found between the pretreatment parameter,ADCmean (p = 0.88), and the therapeutic success. The PET parameters, SUVmaxand SULpeak, MTV, and TLG (p = 0.032, p = 0.01, p < 0.0001, p =0.0004) were statistically significantly different between the two patient subgroups. Conclusion: This study found that MRI-based (ADCmean) data from FDG PET/MRpretreatment could not be used to predict therapeutic response although the PETparameters SUVmax, SULpeak, MTV, and TLG proved to be more useful; thus, theirinclusion in risk stratification may also be of additional value.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPET/MR
dc.subjectpredictive value
dc.subjectSUV
dc.subjectMTV
dc.subjectTLG
dc.subjectADC
dc.subjectclinical outcome
dc.subjectsquamous cell carcinoma
dc.titlePredictive Value of Diffusion, Glucose Metabolism Parameters of PET/MR in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiotherapy
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2020.01484
peapub.journaltitle.mainFrontiers in Oncology
dc.identifier.contributormtmtid10064622
dc.identifier.mtmt31535519
dc.identifier.publisherlinkhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.01484/full
dc.identifier.eissn2234-943X
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue1484


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record